Use cases

Persistent memory
for physical AI.

A proposed memory integration for robots and devices. Preserve written site knowledge and operational records across shifts and hardware changes.

Planned reference integration
PROPOSED WORKFLOWPhysical AI
Operations agentPrepare a replacement unit
REQUEST

A replacement unit is joining the next shift. What context should it recover?

Context starts here

The next response starts with what your agent already knows.

LIGHTHOUSE MEMORY03 RECORDS

Operational context

Site knowledge

01

Maps, dock geometry and operational playbooks associated with the site.

Unit history

02

Observations and shift decisions written by the previous unit.

Calibration record

03

The model identity, offsets and maintenance history relevant to review.

Context available to recall

Reference scenario for a planned integration. An operator validates recovered records before use.

34,000Builders on Lighthouse

Saved context.
Available to connected applications.

THE PROBLEM

What gets lost
between sessions.

01

Knowledge stays on one machine

A reset or hardware replacement can separate the next unit from the context accumulated by its predecessor.

02

Connectivity is intermittent

Robots and field devices need a way to retain pending observations when the network is unavailable.

03

Site and unit history get mixed

A shared map and one robot’s shift observations need different scopes and update rules.

THE PROPOSED FOUNDATION

What an agent’s brain
could remember.

The proposed integration separates shared site records from each device’s observations. It covers local buffering, network writes and recovery for operator review.

01 / SITE MEMORY

Separate shared site records

The proposed design keeps maps and operating instructions separate from device observations. Shared records stay associated with their site.

02 / UNIT MEMORY

Retain device history

Save observations and shift records for each unit. A replacement could recover successfully written records for operator review.

03 / PROPOSED OFFLINE FLOW

Buffer while offline

The planned integration holds pending records on the device, then writes batches when a gateway becomes reachable.

04 / REVIEW CONTEXT

Keep operational records for review

Save model identity, calibration notes and maintenance history. Operators must validate recovered records before using them.

PROPOSED WORKFLOW

How the workflow
uses memory.

Buffer locally, write when connected, then recover and validate the records.

  1. 01

    Buffer on the device

    In the proposed integration, hold pending observations locally while the device is disconnected.

  2. 02

    Flush when connected

    Persist incremental batches when a gateway is reachable and retain the returned CIDs.

  3. 03

    Recover and validate

    Retrieve written records using the namespace credential; validate their suitability before operational use.

WHAT LIGHTHOUSE PROVIDES

The physical AI reference integration is planned. Device buffering, reconnect behaviour and recovery need integration work. Only successfully stored records can be recovered from the network.

IMPLEMENTATION

Set up the records.
Connect your application.

Choose what to store, how to retrieve it and which checks your application must perform.

01

Separate shared site records from unit-specific observations.

02

Keep model identity explicit for procedural and calibration records.

03

Plan local buffering, power-loss handling and reconnect behaviour.

04

Validate recovered records in the robot application before use.

COMMON QUESTIONS

Before
you build.

Is the physical-AI integration available today?

The physical-AI reference integration is planned. On-device buffering, opportunistic flush and site-versus-unit namespaces still require integration work.

Does this replace a robot’s control or safety system?

No. The proposed memory path persists and recovers context. Real-time control, safety enforcement and validation of recovered records remain responsibilities of the device and operator.

What happens while a robot is offline?

The proposed design buffers pending observations on the device and flushes them when connectivity returns. Local buffering needs its own implementation and durability considerations.

Can a replacement recover every recent observation?

Recovery covers records that were successfully written to the network. Observations remaining only in a local pending buffer require a separate recovery path.

BUILD WITH LIGHTHOUSE

Discuss a physical AI integration.