Site knowledge
01Maps, dock geometry and operational playbooks associated with the site.
A proposed memory integration for robots and devices. Preserve written site knowledge and operational records across shifts and hardware changes.
Planned reference integrationMaps, dock geometry and operational playbooks associated with the site.
Observations and shift decisions written by the previous unit.
The model identity, offsets and maintenance history relevant to review.
Reference scenario for a planned integration. An operator validates recovered records before use.
Saved context.
Available to connected applications.
A reset or hardware replacement can separate the next unit from the context accumulated by its predecessor.
Robots and field devices need a way to retain pending observations when the network is unavailable.
A shared map and one robot’s shift observations need different scopes and update rules.
The proposed integration separates shared site records from each device’s observations. It covers local buffering, network writes and recovery for operator review.
The proposed design keeps maps and operating instructions separate from device observations. Shared records stay associated with their site.
Save observations and shift records for each unit. A replacement could recover successfully written records for operator review.
The planned integration holds pending records on the device, then writes batches when a gateway becomes reachable.
Save model identity, calibration notes and maintenance history. Operators must validate recovered records before using them.
Buffer locally, write when connected, then recover and validate the records.

In the proposed integration, hold pending observations locally while the device is disconnected.
Persist incremental batches when a gateway is reachable and retain the returned CIDs.
Retrieve written records using the namespace credential; validate their suitability before operational use.
The physical AI reference integration is planned. Device buffering, reconnect behaviour and recovery need integration work. Only successfully stored records can be recovered from the network.
Choose what to store, how to retrieve it and which checks your application must perform.
Separate shared site records from unit-specific observations.
Keep model identity explicit for procedural and calibration records.
Plan local buffering, power-loss handling and reconnect behaviour.
Validate recovered records in the robot application before use.
The physical-AI reference integration is planned. On-device buffering, opportunistic flush and site-versus-unit namespaces still require integration work.
No. The proposed memory path persists and recovers context. Real-time control, safety enforcement and validation of recovered records remain responsibilities of the device and operator.
The proposed design buffers pending observations on the device and flushes them when connectivity returns. Local buffering needs its own implementation and durability considerations.
Recovery covers records that were successfully written to the network. Observations remaining only in a local pending buffer require a separate recovery path.